Last week, in Part I of this series, I discussed whether having a drug dog sniff a vehicle is a search if the drug dog might alert upon smelling hemp, a substance that is legal to possess. Today’s post focuses on what may be an even more significant question: if a dog alerts, does the alert provide probable cause to search? Continue reading
Tag Archives: marijuana
It has not been long since my last cannabis update, but there are some interesting new developments to report, most notably on drug identification and marijuana. Read on for the details. Continue reading →
Category: Crimes and Elements, Evidence, Procedure, Search and Seizure, Uncategorized | Tags: Arthur, cannabinoids, cannabis, delta-9 THC, drug ID, drug identification, fletcher, hemp, Industrial Hemp Act, marijuana, osborne, Rule 702, schedule VI, sufficiency of the evidence, teague, THC, ward
It’s been nearly a year since I’ve written about cannabis issues in the state. Many of the issues I’ve discussed here before remain unresolved, but there has been recent legislation and a new case impacting this area. This post examines the current state of the law on hemp and marijuana. Continue reading →
Category: Crimes and Elements, Search and Seizure, Uncategorized | Tags: 90-94, cannabis, delta-8, delta-9, drugs, hemp, marijuana, probable cause, state v. highsmith, THC
Cannabis news abounds: Virginia legalized recreational marijuana for adults 21 and up this year; our General Assembly has been considering a medicinal marijuana bill (S.B. 711); the Court of Appeals recently acknowledged (but did not decide) that precedent on the odor of marijuana as probable cause and on visual identification of the substance “may need to be re-examined” in light of legal hemp. State v. Parker, ___ N.C. App. ___, 860 S.E.2d 21, 29 (2021) (more on those issues here). I will write about the still-evolving issues with marijuana prosecutions in the state again soon. Today, though, I want to focus delta-8 THC. What is it? Is it legal? If so, how? Turns out the first question is simpler than the rest. Continue reading →
Category: Crimes and Elements | Tags: analogue controlled substance, cannabis, CBD, delta-10 THC, delta-8 THC, hemp, isolated THC, marijuana, synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic THC
I recently taught on the basics of drug law in North Carolina and was reminded just what a tricky area it can be. Chapter 90 of the N.C. General Statutes is a dense, complex, and ever-evolving set of laws proscribing controlled substances. There are many substances, offenses, enhancements, and sentencing rules to know, as well as evidence issues and offense-specific case law. One thorny area involves the law of drug mixtures. While practitioners handling felony drug cases may be aware of the rules here, they may come as a surprise to others. Some applications of the law in this area can produce unexpected results for the unwary defendant. Today’s post examines the rules of drug mixtures and their implications in North Carolina. Continue reading →
Category: Crimes and Elements, Uncategorized | Tags: cannabis, controlled substances, drug mixtures, drug weights, drugs, isolated THC, marijuana, marijuana edibles, marijuana extracts, opiates, opioids, oxycodone, percocet, pills, THC, trafficking
On Thursday, June 4, 2020, the North Carolina General Assembly passed S.B. 315, referred to as the State Farm Bill, which was subsequently signed into law by the Governor. The bill was pending all last session and stalled, allegedly over a dispute about how to treat smokable hemp. As I understand it, the bill originally intended to clarify that hemp in all forms (including smokable hemp) was legal (here is an earlier version of the bill taking that approach). After hearing objections from law enforcement and prosecutors (as detailed in the SBI memo on the subject), the proposed bill was changed to ban smokable hemp and regulate the rest of the hemp industry in a variety of ways. When the bill was last being discussed in the news, the dispute at the General Assembly had apparently narrowed to when the smokable hemp ban was to kick in. But, the bill never passed last session, and we were without a Farm Bill until this month. So, what big changes does the bill have in store for hemp in North Carolina? Continue reading →
Category: Crimes and Elements, Evidence, Search and Seizure, Uncategorized | Tags: cannabis, CBD, drug identification, farm bill, hemp, marijuana, probable cause, SB 315, SB 352, THC
The advent of cannabis legalization across the country has led to a proliferation of new types of cannabis products. There are skin patches, food and drinks (for humans and pets), vaporizer or “vape” cartridges (or “carts”), and different concentrate or extract products (“dabs”, “wax” or “shatter”, among other names). [Click that last link and scroll down to see a chart listing the different forms of extracts and their names.] The products can be made from lawful hemp, or from illegal marijuana alike. The illegal versions have found their way into North Carolina, and questions abound regarding how to handle these cases. The questions most commonly involve wax and cartridges, so this post takes a look at the issues surrounding those cases (leaving the skin patches and edibles for another day). Continue reading →
Category: Crimes and Elements, Search and Seizure | Tags: cannabis, cartridges, carts, CBD, concentrates, dabs, extracted resin, hemp, isolated THC, marijuana, probable cause, shatter, THC, vaping, wax
Back in November of last year, I wrote about hemp and CBD laws here. I have been teaching quite a bit on the subject lately and wanted to follow up that post with an examination of how legal use of hemp products may affect marijuana prosecutions in North Carolina. Continue reading →
Category: Crimes and Elements, Evidence, Search and Seizure | Tags: cannabis, CBD, drug identification, drug paraphernalia, drug tests, hemp, marijuana, state v. fletcher
Chances are you’ve heard of CBD products. Many cities around North Carolina have stores specializing in CBD products, and it’s widely available online and in ‘vape’ shops. It’s marketed for its health benefits and is touted as a safe and legal (if largely unregulated) treatment for a variety of conditions, from depression to inflammation to cancer and acne. I was recently asked to look at the law surrounding CBD products, and this post summarizes what I found. Continue reading →
Category: Crimes and Elements, Uncategorized | Tags: cannabidiol, cannabinoids, CBD, controlled substances, dea, hemp, marijuana
May an officer search a motor vehicle based on the officer’s detection of the odor of marijuana coming from the vehicle? May the officer search the occupants of the vehicle? Several recent cases address these questions. Continue reading →
Category: Motor Vehicles, Search and Seizure, Uncategorized | Tags: marijuana, motor vehicles, odor of marijuana, probable cause, search, Search and Seizure
