Relevancy: Weapons (March 23, 2010)
Jessica Smith
Recently, I’ve been posting about relevancy issues that arise with some frequency in North Carolina criminal cases. A final topic in that vein is the relevancy of evidence pertaining to […]
BLOG
March 23, 2010
Recently, I’ve been posting about relevancy issues that arise with some frequency in North Carolina criminal cases. A final topic in that vein is the relevancy of evidence pertaining to […]
READ POST "Relevancy: Weapons (March 23, 2010)"March 17, 2010
In an earlier post, I wrote about relevancy and guilt of another. In this post, I consider another relevancy issue: context, circumstances, and chain of events evidence. Consider this problem: […]
READ POST "Relevancy: “Context,” “Circumstances,” and “Chain of Events” Evidence (March 17, 2010)"March 15, 2010
Every state and the District of Columbia prohibits driving with an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more though state laws vary regarding whether to establish a violation of the per […]
READ POST ".08 at Any Relevant Time after the Driving (March 15, 2010)"March 8, 2010
Editor’s note: Jessie has prepared a series of posts about the law of relevancy. They’ll run as an intermittent series over the next several weeks. In this and upcoming posts, […]
READ POST "Relevancy: Guilt of Another (March 8, 2010)"February 9, 2010
A civil case decided by the court of appeals last week, Blackwell v. Hatley, addresses when a witness may testify as to his or her opinion of how fast a […]
READ POST "The Need for (Evidence of) Speed (February 9, 2010)"February 4, 2010
The court of appeals just decided State v. Hernandez, which raises an important and recurrent hearsay issue. Briefly, the facts of Hernandez are as follows: the defendant traveled with his […]
READ POST "Victims’ Statements about Defendants’ Prior Violent Acts (February 4, 2010)"January 28, 2010
Update: On February 16, the North Carolina Court of Appeals issued an opinion in State v. Davis, in which law enforcement officers were allowed to offer lay testimony without objection […]
READ POST "Visual Identification of Drugs Takes Another Hit (January 28, 2010)"January 26, 2010
On June 25, 2009, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, holding that forensic laboratory reports are testimonial and thus subject to the new Crawford […]
READ POST "High Court Declines to Revisit or Modify Melendez-Diaz (January 26, 2010)"January 14, 2010
Regular readers know that I have a particular interest in the intersection of new technologies and criminal law. But I am not the only person at the School of Government […]
READ POST "Electronic Evidence (January 14, 2010)"January 6, 2010
In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachussetts, the United States Supreme Court held that forensic laboratory reports—such as those identifying a substance as a controlled substance—are testimonial and subject to the new Crawford […]
READ POST "North Carolina’s Notice and Demand Statute for Chemical Analyses in Drug Cases Is Constitutional (January 6, 2010)"