…Bulletin. It is an excellent explanation of Maryland v. Shatzer, the Miranda decision about which I blogged here. I am still getting quite a few questions about Shatzer, the “break…
…six phones and a gun. The defendant waived Miranda and admitted his involvement in trafficking. Other drug stashes, guns, and large amounts of currency were found in the other places…
…representation thereafter (more on that below). In the U.S., although law enforcement must give arrested suspects Miranda warnings, in which officers tell defendants they have a right to a lawyer…
…– before a federal magistrate judge, who advised Tsarnaev of his Miranda rights in the course of the proceeding. (Investigators had not previously read him his rights, apparently on the…
…the bag. A search of the backpack led to the discovery of more than four pounds of methamphetamine. The defendant waived his Miranda rights and spoke to the officers. He…
…interested in child pornography. Boucher said he was unsure whether his computer contained child pornography. The officers read Boucher his Miranda rights, which he waived, and Boucher said that he…
…error in the denial of his motion to suppress testimony obtained in violation of his Miranda rights and limitation of his cross-examination of an officer testifying against him. The Court…
…was improperly detained without a Miranda warning. The court disagreed, explaining that “the trial court found [the deputy’s] testimony was credible and, in doing so, resolved any testimonial conflicts in…
…the Fifth Amendment. See State v. Strickland, 276 N.C. 253, 257-258 (1970). For that reason, no Miranda warnings are required before administration of a chemical analysis. Id. The Supreme Court…
