…which provides that “[a] lawyer shall not reveal information acquired during the professional relationship with a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order…
…two ways. First, it confers jurisdiction when the prosecutor and defendant consent, removing the requirement that the presiding district court judge also consent. Second, it provides that “[t]he chief district…
Not all changes to a person’s probation happen after a hearing. Many changes are made in chambers (or some other location other than the courtroom), with the consent of the…
In State v. Harbison, 315 N.C. 175 (1985), the North Carolina Supreme Court held that when defense counsel admits the defendant’s guilt to the jury without the defendant’s consent per…
…consent to a non-jury trial was not permissible, consent to a non-unanimous jury would also seem to be impermissible. Would a defendant ever want to agree? Why would a defendant…
…the time would support the belief that the consenting person had the authority to consent. Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 189 (1990) (internal citation omitted). Where, as was the…
…parked at a hotel in Cornelius, and as the couple left the car and headed to the hotel, the officer approached and inquired about the vehicle. Defendant eventually consented to…
…minded being patted down. The defendant refused consent. One of the officers threatened to arrest him for trespassing and continued seeking consent to frisk. The defendant reiterated that he was…
…safety. The defendant stated he was not armed and did not consent to a frisk. When the officer said he was “just going to pat [Defendant] down,” the defendant said,…
…260 (1999). But what, practically speaking, does this entail? Defendant turns her car over to impaired driver and rides along One situation clearly covered by the aiding and abetting theory…
