This post summaries published criminal and related decisions decided by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in June, 2020.
Phil Dixon
![blank](https://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Dixon_Phil-1-150x150.jpg)
Case Summaries – North Carolina Court of Appeals (July 7, 2020)
This post summarizes published criminal opinions of the Court of Appeals decided on July 7, 2020.
![blank](https://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Dixon_Phil-1-150x150.jpg)
Summer 2020 Hemp Update
On Thursday, June 4, 2020, the North Carolina General Assembly passed S.B. 315, referred to as the State Farm Bill, which was subsequently signed into law by the Governor. The bill was pending all last session and stalled, allegedly over a dispute about how to treat smokable hemp. As I understand it, the bill originally intended to clarify that hemp in all forms (including smokable hemp) was legal (here is an earlier version of the bill taking that approach). After hearing objections from law enforcement and prosecutors (as detailed in the SBI memo on the subject), the proposed bill was changed to ban smokable hemp and regulate the rest of the hemp industry in a variety of ways. When the bill was last being discussed in the news, the dispute at the General Assembly had apparently narrowed to when the smokable hemp ban was to kick in. But, the bill never passed last session, and we were without a Farm Bill until this month. So, what big changes does the bill have in store for hemp in North Carolina?
![blank](https://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Dixon_Phil-1-150x150.jpg)
Case Summaries – N.C. Supreme Court (May 1, 2020)
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Supreme Court decided on May 1, 2020.
![blank](https://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Dixon_Phil-1-150x150.jpg)
Preserving Motions to Dismiss for Insufficient Evidence
Earlier this month, the North Carolina Supreme Court decided State v. Golder, ___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, 2020 WL 1650899 (April 3, 2020). Before that decision, there were somewhat tricky rules about how to preserve appellate review of all issues in a motion to dismiss for insufficiency of the evidence. No more. The Golder decision clarifies that all sufficiency issues are preserved with a properly timed motion to dismiss at trial. This decision overrules a line of cases holding otherwise and simplifies the process of preserving sufficiency issues at trial for defense counsel. Read on for the details.
![blank](https://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Dixon_Phil-1-150x150.jpg)
Case Summaries – N.C. Court of Appeals (April 7, 2020)
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals decided on April 7, 2020.
![blank](https://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Dixon_Phil-1-150x150.jpg)
Schalow II and Dismissal for Failure to Join Offenses
On Jan. 7, 2020, the Court of Appeals decided State v. Schalow (“Schalow II”), ___ N.C. App. ___, 837 S.E.2d 593, temp. stay allowed, ___ N.C. ___, 837 S.E.2d 123 (Jan. 27, 2020), ruling that the State’s third prosecution of the defendant was vindictive and violated the rules for joinder of offenses. I previously wrote about the Court of Appeals decision in Schalow I regarding a double jeopardy issue (on which the defendant also prevailed), here. The vindictive prosecution holding of Schalow II is itself significant, and I encourage everyone to read the opinion in full for that part of the case alone. In this post, though, I wanted to focus on the joinder issue. This issue in the Schalow II opinion represents the first time that our appellate division has ever granted relief for a joinder of offenses violation.