Melendez-Diaz and Limited Privileges
Shea Denning
If a 0.15 alcohol concentration is not admitted at trial or sentencing, does it count for limited privilege purposes? I discussed in an earlier post circumstances in which the Confrontation […]
August 26, 2009
If a 0.15 alcohol concentration is not admitted at trial or sentencing, does it count for limited privilege purposes? I discussed in an earlier post circumstances in which the Confrontation […]
Read post "Melendez-Diaz and Limited Privileges"July 27, 2009
In my last post on this topic, I addressed the “new rule” prong of Teague retroactivity analysis as it applies to Melendez-Diaz. I ended that post by noting that another […]
Read post "Retroactivity of Melendez-Diaz (Again)"July 24, 2009
Jeff Welty blogged here and Jessica Smith published a paper here about the implications of the Supreme Court’s holding in Melendez-Diaz that forensic laboratory reports are testimonial, rendering the affiants […]
Read post "What’s Blakely got to do with it? Sentencing in Impaired Driving Cases after Melendez-Diaz"July 20, 2009
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. __, 129 S. Ct. 2527 (2009), decided by the United States Supreme Court last month, already has had significant implications for criminal prosecutions in North […]
Read post "Retroactivity of Melendez-Diaz"July 6, 2009
I was on vacation last week, and the buzz around Melendez-Diaz — see this prior post for the basics — was partly drowned out by the sound of the waves […]
Read post "The Impact of Melendez-Diaz on North Carolina"June 26, 2009
In yesterday’s frivolous post, I said that legal news was slow. Not anymore! The United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts yesterday. It’s a big Confrontation Clause case, and […]
Read post "Melendez-Diaz: Crawford Applies to Lab Reports"