…2000. The officer asked the driver for consent to search the car and the driver agreed, but said that he did not want his bag and hoodies searched. The officer…
…the statute. Furthermore, we’re a so-called one party consent state. Under G.S. 15A-287, it is illegal to intercept an oral communication only absent “the consent of at least one party…
…officer then asked the driver for consent to walk his drug dog around the vehicle, but the driver refused to give his consent. Nonetheless, the officer told the driver to…
…lack of consent and intent. The trial court also conducted a Rule 403 balancing test and concluded that the proffered evidence was sufficiently similar and close in time to be…
…the warrant is based,” while “a search pursuant to consent is limited by the extent of the consent given for the search by the individual.” Other authorities. I’m not aware…
In State v. Harbison, 315 N.C. 175 (1985), the North Carolina Supreme Court held that when defense counsel admits the defendant’s guilt to the jury without the defendant’s consent per…
…defendant was suspected of involvement in drug trafficking. Police performed a traffic stop in the Western District of North Carolina and the defendant ultimately consented to a search of the…
…had considered whether the Constitution bars counsel from conceding a capital defendant’s guilt at trial when the defendant, informed by counsel, neither consents nor objects. In Nixon, defense counsel had…
…fraudulent intent. G.S. 14-453 defines authorization as having the consent or permission of the owner—or of the person licensed or authorized by the owner to grant consent or permission—to access…
…majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito. The majority held that Currier’s consent to two trials when having only one trial would have avoided…