…which provides that “[a] lawyer shall not reveal information acquired during the professional relationship with a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order…
…two ways. First, it confers jurisdiction when the prosecutor and defendant consent, removing the requirement that the presiding district court judge also consent. Second, it provides that “[t]he chief district…
Not all changes to a person’s probation happen after a hearing. Many changes are made in chambers (or some other location other than the courtroom), with the consent of the…
In State v. Harbison, 315 N.C. 175 (1985), the North Carolina Supreme Court held that when defense counsel admits the defendant’s guilt to the jury without the defendant’s consent per…
…consent to a non-jury trial was not permissible, consent to a non-unanimous jury would also seem to be impermissible. Would a defendant ever want to agree? Why would a defendant…
…the time would support the belief that the consenting person had the authority to consent. Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 189 (1990) (internal citation omitted). Where, as was the…
…parked at a hotel in Cornelius, and as the couple left the car and headed to the hotel, the officer approached and inquired about the vehicle. Defendant eventually consented to…
…render the consent entry invalid even if the warrant was defective. The question here was one of consent. The court approved the ruling of the trial court that “the man…
…of murder on the basis of starvation; (3) if malice is implied, then starving must be defined as the complete deprivation of food and water; and (4) his conviction for…
…[the defendant] could not . . . block all further progress of the case. . . . [T]he accused necessarily impliedly consented that if the demurrer were sustained . ….