Weapons Probationers Can’t Have (April 30, 2015)
Jamie Markham
Probationers generally cannot have guns. What other weapons can they not have?
BLOG
April 30, 2015
Probationers generally cannot have guns. What other weapons can they not have?
READ POST "Weapons Probationers Can’t Have (April 30, 2015)"April 21, 2015
Many of you have received one of those letters: a notice from the N.C. Department of Public Safety, Division of Adult Correction (DAC), Section of Combined Records, seeking “clarification” of a judgment. Combined Records audits judgments as they come in, identifying issues and sentencing errors and bringing them to the attention of the court system. Today’s post considers the legal basis for this review, and some of the issues it raises.
READ POST "DAC’s Auditing Authority (April 21, 2015)"April 14, 2015
The maximum punishment for driving while impaired in violation of G.S. 20-138.1 increased from two to three years in 2011. As a result, defendants convicted of misdemeanor DWI and sentenced at the most serious level—Aggravated Level One—are prohibited from possessing firearms by federal law. That’s because federal law prohibits firearm possession by a person who has been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, though state law misdemeanors that are punishable by a term of imprisonment of two years or less are excluded from this category of disqualifying convictions. Because North Carolina law sets out a single offense of driving while impaired, which may be punished at varying levels, rather than six separate offenses, there is a question as to whether any defendant convicted of misdemeanor DWI on or after December 1, 2011 may lawfully possess a firearm, regardless of the level at which the defendant was actually punished.
READ POST "Does a DWI Conviction Bar a Person from Possessing a Gun? (April 14, 2015)"April 13, 2015
Today’s post is a video explaining the rules for extending probation in North Carolina. It covers the two different types of extensions, and answers the question of how many times a case may be extended, and for how long. I hope you’ll take a look.
READ POST "Sentencing Whiteboard: Extending Probation (April 13, 2015)"March 31, 2015
It’s time to post an updated sex offender and monitoring flow chart. I was going to do it last week, but I’m glad I didn’t. Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed North Carolina’s appellate courts on an issue that may impact the constitutionality of SBM. The new chart, available here, incorporates Grady v. North Carolina and includes several other changes.
READ POST "Revised Sex Offender Flow Chart (March 2015 edition) (March 31, 2015)"March 24, 2015
Spring is upon us, and today’s post addresses the top five DWI sentencing questions of the season.
READ POST "Two-Timing on the Weekends is Allowed . . . and Other Rules for DWI Sentences (March 24, 2015)"March 23, 2015
When a defendant is convicted of more than one crime, there are decisions to be made about how the sentences for those convictions will fit together. Generally speaking, they may be consolidated for judgment, allowed to run concurrently, or set to run consecutively. If at least one of those judgments suspends a sentence and places the defendant on probation, the judge has an additional decision to make regarding when probation begins.
READ POST "When Probation Begins (March 23, 2015)"March 17, 2015
A defendant is sentenced to 10–21 months for a Class H felony. How much time will he or she actually serve? What about a Class D felon sentenced to 59–83 months?
READ POST "Time Actually Served (March 17, 2015)"March 10, 2015
Advanced Supervised Release was created in 2011. Today’s post is a video that explains who is eligible for ASR, how to calculate an ASR date, how to fill out an ASR judgment, and what the law means for the defendant as a practical matter.
READ POST "Sentencing Whiteboard: Advanced Supervised Release (March 10, 2015)"March 2, 2015
Suppose a crime victim offers a reward related to a crime—money for information leading to the return of stolen property, or perhaps information leading to the apprehension of an assailant. If the reward works and leads to a person’s conviction, may the court order the defendant to pay the victim restitution for the reward? Today’s post considers that question, and the related question of whether it is proper to order restitution to third parties that offer rewards, like crime stoppers.
READ POST "Restitution for Rewards (March 2, 2015)"