An Update on Absconding (August 25, 2017)
Jamie Markham
A recent appellate case sheds additional light on what it means to abscond from probation.
BLOG
August 25, 2017
A recent appellate case sheds additional light on what it means to abscond from probation.
READ POST "An Update on Absconding (August 25, 2017)"August 11, 2017
On December 1, 2017, two new rules will kick in for waivers and remissions of costs, fines, and restitution. Today’s post offers some preliminary thoughts on those new rules.
READ POST "New Notice Requirements for Waivers and Remissions of Certain Monetary Obligations (August 11, 2017)"August 8, 2017
If you’ve noticed an uptick in probation hearings on extensions, today’s post may help explain why. As of last month, Community Corrections will no longer seek ordinary extensions of probation without notice and a hearing. In other words, they will no longer seek “in chambers” extension orders, even when the defendant consents to them.
READ POST "A Change to Probation’s Policy on Ordinary Extensions (August 8, 2017)"August 4, 2017
When determining a defendant’s prior record level for felony sentencing, prior convictions count for points according to their classification as of the offense date of the crime now being sentenced. G.S. 15A-1340.14(c). That law helps modernize a person’s record, treating it according to present-day classification standards as opposed to those that existed at the time of the prior offenses themselves. The rule can cut in either direction. If the offense class of the prior conviction has increased between the time of the prior and present offenses, the prior counts for points according to the higher offense class. If the offense class has decreased, the prior counts at its new, reduced level.
The rule is simple enough to apply when an offense classification for a single crime is ratcheted up or down. What do you do, though, when a person has a prior conviction for an offense that has since been split into multiple offenses with different classifications? A recent case gives some guidance.
READ POST "Classifying Prior Convictions for Sentencing Purposes (August 4, 2017)"July 27, 2017
Whether or not to grant a conditional discharge for an eligible defendant under G.S. 90-96(a) used to be within the discretion of the trial judge. In 2011, Justice Reinvestment made G.S. 90-96(a) mandatory for eligible defendants who consented to it. Two years later, it was once again made discretionary. Or was it?
READ POST "Is G.S. 90-96(a) Mandatory or Discretionary? (July 27, 2017)"July 20, 2017
Can a person convicted and sentenced to prison in North Carolina serve the time in another state? Can a person convicted elsewhere serve his or her sentence here?
READ POST "The Interstate Corrections Compact (July 20, 2017)"July 13, 2017
With another legislative session in the books, it’s time for an update to the sex offender registration and monitoring flow chart.
READ POST "Revised Sex Offender Flow Chart (July 2017 Edition) (July 13, 2017)"July 6, 2017
“Arrest on first positive drug screen. $50,000 secured bond.”
“Hold without bond for any probation violation.”
May a judge sentencing a defendant to probation include instructions such as these in the judgment suspending sentence?
READ POST "Anticipatory Bonds for Probation Violations (July 6, 2017)"June 8, 2017
After nearly 18 years at the helm, Judge Erwin Spainhour is stepping down as chairman of the North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission. Today’s post takes a moment to recognize his service and the good work done by the Commission under his leadership.
READ POST "Judge Spainhour Stepping Down as Sentencing Commission Chair (June 8, 2017)"June 1, 2017
The trial court’s order regarding sex offender registration and satellite-based monitoring (SBM) in State v. Johnson was wrong in part. But also right in part. But ultimately wrong.
READ POST "Lifetime SBM without Lifetime Registration (June 1, 2017)"