Supreme Court Preview: 2015 Term (October 5, 2015)
Jeff Welty
It’s the first Monday in October, which means it’s the first day of the Supreme Court’s 2015 Term. Read on to learn about the criminal law cases that the Court will consider.
BLOG
October 5, 2015
It’s the first Monday in October, which means it’s the first day of the Supreme Court’s 2015 Term. Read on to learn about the criminal law cases that the Court will consider.
READ POST "Supreme Court Preview: 2015 Term (October 5, 2015)"September 30, 2015
The General Assembly has just adjourned for the year. Last week, it passed, and the Governor signed, an omnibus criminal law bill, S.L. 2015-247. This post briefly summarizes its main provisions.
READ POST "Omnibus Criminal Law Bill (September 30, 2015)"September 21, 2015
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. Perry. It’s the appellate division’s first foray into cell site location information and a case that raises questions about the status of the exclusionary rule in North Carolina.
READ POST "State v. Perry, Cell Site Location Information, and the Exclusionary Rule (September 21, 2015)"September 10, 2015
I recently taught a class of law students about criminal pleadings. We discussed proper pleadings and defective pleadings, and the State’s ability to bring new charges against a defendant after a case is dismissed due to a fatal defect in the pleading. It was an interesting conversation, and it prompted me to look into the matter a bit more. This post summarizes the law.
READ POST "Pleading Defects and Double Jeopardy (September 10, 2015)"September 1, 2015
I’ve had the same question several times recently: can a magistrate issue a search warrant for a computer or a cell phone? The answer is yes. This post explains why that’s so, and why there’s some confusion about the issue.
READ POST "Can a Magistrate Issue a Search Warrant for a Computer or a Cell Phone? (September 1, 2015)"August 25, 2015
As I discussed here, the Fourth Circuit recently ruled in United States v. Graham, __ F.3d __, 2015 WL 4637931 (4th Cir. Aug. 5, 2015), that an officer who obtained two suspects’ cell site location information (CSLI) without a search warrant violated the Fourth Amendment. (The officer used a court order based on a lower standard, as purportedly authorized by the relevant federal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d).) I’ve had a number of practical questions about Graham from officers, agency attorneys, and judges, and I thought that I would collect some of the questions here.
READ POST "Advice to Officers After Graham (August 25, 2015)"August 24, 2015
Suppose that after judgment is entered a defendant wants to challenge a plea. Maybe he alleges that the plea wasn’t knowing and voluntary. Or maybe he claims that the judge imposed an illegal sentence. Can the defendant do this? I like to break this question into two parts: (1) Does the claim survive the plea? (2) If so, what procedural mechanism can be used to assert it? This post addresses both issues.
READ POST "Challenging a Plea (August 24, 2015)"August 12, 2015
Once a plea is entered pursuant to a plea agreement, the parties are bound by the agreement and failure to comply with it constitutes a breach. Occasionally questions arise about whether a breach has occurred and if so, what remedy should apply.
READ POST "Breach of a Plea Agreement (August 12, 2015)"August 4, 2015
Sometimes a party to a plea agreement has buyer’s remorse and wants to get out of the deal. The standard for evaluating such a request varies, depending on when the motion is made.
READ POST "Buyer’s Remorse: Withdrawing from a Plea Agreement (August 4, 2015)"July 27, 2015
Can a prosecutor threaten more serious charges if the defendant refuses to agree to a plea bargain? Can a plea bargain include a promise by the State to be more lenient on the defendant’s wife? Read on for answers.
READ POST "Plea Bargaining: What Can and Can’t Be on the Table? (July 27, 2015)"