When May Evidence of HGN Come on Down . . . or In?
The question I am most frequently asked these days is some version of the following: May a law enforcement officer trained in administering the HGN test testify at trial about […]
August 25, 2016
The question I am most frequently asked these days is some version of the following: May a law enforcement officer trained in administering the HGN test testify at trial about […]
June 15, 2016
The North Carolina Supreme Court held in State v. McGrady, __ N.C.___ (June 10, 2016), that Rule 702(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence incorporates the standard set forth […]
May 3, 2016
There seem to be fewer and fewer reported decisions about criminal discovery in North Carolina. A recent North Carolina Supreme Court decision finding a discovery violation by the prosecution, State […]
April 27, 2016
Author’s note: I added the conclusory paragraph at the end of this post shortly after its initial publication in response to helpful questions from readers about the significance of State […]
March 2, 2016
Proving that a driver was impaired by alcohol is not all that difficult, particularly when the driver submits to a breath test and the result is .08 or more. Proving […]
September 9, 2015
The court of appeals gave the green light last week for law enforcement officers to continue to testify as scientific experts in DWI cases involving retrograde extrapolation–notwithstanding the legislature’s amendment […]
July 1, 2014
With the amendment of Rule 702 of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence in 2011, North Carolina became a Daubert state. That change means that trial judges in this state, […]