The Absconding Donut Hole (September 5, 2012)
Jamie Markham
In 2012, a person on supervised probation for an offense that occurred before December 1, 2011 moves to another state without permission. Months later he is arrested there and brought […]
BLOG
September 5, 2012
In 2012, a person on supervised probation for an offense that occurred before December 1, 2011 moves to another state without permission. Months later he is arrested there and brought […]
READ POST "The Absconding Donut Hole (September 5, 2012)"August 28, 2012
Jeff previously posted his “cocktail party review” of significant criminal law legislation passed this year by the North Carolina General Assembly, or at least legislation people might be interested in […]
READ POST "Complete Summaries of 2012 Legislation Now Available (August 28, 2012)"August 27, 2012
About a year and a half ago I did a blog post here about trial in the defendant’s absence. The recent Court of Appeals case, State v. Anderson, suggests that […]
READ POST "Explaining the Defendant’s Absence at Trial (August 27, 2012)"August 23, 2012
Jeff wrote earlier this week about the court of appeals’ opinion in State v. Osterhoudt (August 21, 2012). Jeff’s post dealt with the court’s substantive analysis of whether the police […]
READ POST "State v. Osterhoudt and motions procedures in implied consent cases (August 23, 2012)"August 22, 2012
A probation violation must be willful. In this prior post I wrote about the burden-shifting process in which the State must prove to the court’s reasonable satisfaction that a violation […]
READ POST "Is Being Homeless a Probation Violation? (August 22, 2012)"August 20, 2012
A fatal defect in an indictment occurs when the indictment fails to allege an essential element of the crime charged. A fatal variance, by contrast, occurs when the facts brought […]
READ POST "Fatal Variance — Use It or Lose It (August 20, 2012)"August 16, 2012
A criminal indictment must allege an offense date. G.S. 15A-924(a)(4) provides that a criminal pleading must contain “[a] statement or cross reference in each count indicating that the offense charged […]
READ POST "Alibi Defense Doesn’t Mean the State Can’t Amend the Offense Date (August 16, 2012)"August 7, 2012
In yesterday’s post I set out the basics of the Bruton rule. Put simply, Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968), held that a defendant’s confrontation clause rights are […]
READ POST "Crawford’s Implications on the Bruton Rule (August 7, 2012)"August 6, 2012
Although recent confrontation clause litigation has focused on the new Crawford rule, the Bruton rule continues to create issues in joint trials of codefendants. In this post I’ll give you […]
READ POST "The Bruton Rule: A Primer (August 6, 2012)"July 31, 2012
Can a defendant who chooses to represent himself subsequently argue that he received ineffective assistance of “counsel”? No, as illustrated by the recent case of State v. Brunson, __ N.C. […]
READ POST "Pro Se Defendants and Ineffective Assistance of “Counsel” (July 31, 2012)"