The Opinion Question: Myth or Magic? (May 2, 2013)
Shea Denning
Even the greenest of prosecutors knows to ask it. And all officers, from rookie to veteran, know how to answer. Rare is the impaired driving case without it. What’s the […]
BLOG
May 2, 2013
Even the greenest of prosecutors knows to ask it. And all officers, from rookie to veteran, know how to answer. Rare is the impaired driving case without it. What’s the […]
READ POST "The Opinion Question: Myth or Magic? (May 2, 2013)"April 30, 2013
In this second post on Rule 404(b) evidence [editor’s note: the first post in this occasional series is here], I’ll address a point that sometimes gets overlooked in the admissibility […]
READ POST "Rule 404(b): Did He Really Do It? (April 30, 2013)"April 17, 2013
Evidence Rule 404(b) allows for the admission of evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts for purposes other than propensity, such as proving motive, opportunity, intent, preparation or plan. In […]
READ POST "Rule 404(b): The Bare Fact of Conviction Rule (April 17, 2013)"April 3, 2013
I’ve previously discussed the forfeiture by wrongdoing exception to the confrontation clause in this blog (here) and in numerous other publications (for example, here). In a nutshell, the forfeiture by […]
READ POST "Fourth Circuit Declines to Take a Restrictive View of Forfeiture by Wrongdoing (April 3, 2013)"March 25, 2013
The state crime lab and other local laboratories perform nearly 10,000 blood toxicology analyses annually, the vast majority of them in impaired driving cases. Unlike breath analysis results, which the […]
READ POST "State crime lab backlogs and the right to speedy trial (March 25, 2013)"March 20, 2013
Suppose a child victim of sexual abuse is referred to a psychologist for counseling. In the course of treatment the child reveals details about the abuse. If the child doesn’t […]
READ POST "Are a Child’s Statements to a Treating Psychologist Admissible Under Hinnant? (March 20, 2013)"January 30, 2013
I have been asked several times whether the state may admit, under N.C. R. Evid. 404(b), evidence of noncriminal conduct. The answer is yes, assuming of course that the evidence […]
READ POST "Rule 404(b) and Noncriminal Conduct (January 30, 2013)"January 3, 2013
Suppose in a robbery case that the State asks the defendant–who does not plan to testify–to stand in the courtroom wearing a mask allegedly worn by the robber. The defense […]
READ POST "Requiring the Defendant to Pose for the Jury (January 3, 2013)"December 10, 2012
The recent case, State v. Ryan, presents an issue that keeps our appellate courts busy: the proper scope of expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases. In Ryan, after the […]
READ POST "Experts in Child Sex Cases: Reversible Error in a Recent Case (December 10, 2012)"December 3, 2012
In a paper here I analyze Williams v. Illinois, the U.S. Supreme Court’s latest confrontation decision on substitute analyst testimony. Because Williams was a fractured opinion in which no rationale […]
READ POST "California Tackles Substitute Analysts Post-Williams (December 3, 2012)"