Rap Lyrics as Confessions (August 27, 2013)
Jeff Welty
When may rap lyrics written by a defendant be admitted as evidence of guilt? That question has been in the news quite a bit lately as a result of a […]
BLOG
August 27, 2013
When may rap lyrics written by a defendant be admitted as evidence of guilt? That question has been in the news quite a bit lately as a result of a […]
READ POST "Rap Lyrics as Confessions (August 27, 2013)"August 21, 2013
The North Carolina Court of Appeals decided its first breath-testing source code case yesterday. The court in State v. Marino affirmed the trial court’s determination that the defendant had no […]
READ POST "State v. Marino Finds No Error in Denying Defendant Source Code (August 21, 2013)"July 10, 2013
If you’re on my listserv, you know that the NC Supreme Court recently issued several confrontation clause decisions, all dealing with substitute analysts (if you’re not on my listserv, you […]
READ POST "The NC Supreme Court’s Recent Substitute Analyst Cases (July 10, 2013)"June 27, 2013
Nearly two thousand defendants were charged last year with aiding and abetting driving while impaired in violation of G.S. 20-138.1. A defendant aids and abets impaired driving when he knowingly […]
READ POST "Aiding and Abetting Impaired Driving (June 27, 2013)"June 20, 2013
Rule 45. This rule surprised me. Before I learned about it, I assumed that when a party sought to introduce hospital medical records at trial, a records custodian appeared in […]
READ POST "Special Rules for the Admission of Hospital Medical Records (June 20, 2013)"June 10, 2013
My recent paper (here) on the use of remote testimony in criminal cases involving forensic analysts was written in part because of the flood of interest in legislative solutions to […]
READ POST "Beyond Legislative Solutions to Melendez-Diaz (June 10, 2013)"May 21, 2013
As I noted in my last post on Rule 404(b) evidence, even when the evidence is relevant to an issue other than propensity or disposition, admissibility is “constrained by the […]
READ POST "Rule 404(b): The Requirement of Temporal Proximity (May 21, 2013)"May 14, 2013
Suppose that a murder defendant goes by the street name “Hit Man.” The prosecution wants the investigating officer to testify that she received a tip that “Hit Man” committed the […]
READ POST "Street Names and Nicknames (May 14, 2013)"May 13, 2013
Even when Rule 404(b) evidence is relevant to an issue other than propensity or disposition, admissibility is “constrained by the requirements of similarity and temporal proximity.” State v. Beckelheimer, __ […]
READ POST "Rule 404(b): The Requirement of Similarity (May 13, 2013)"May 7, 2013
Rule 404(b) is a rule of inclusion subject to one exception: the evidence must be excluded if its only probative value is to show that the defendant had the propensity […]
READ POST "Rule 404(b): Proper Purpose Other than Propensity (May 7, 2013)"