I’ve recently updated my paper on traffic stops. As before, it covers stops from start to finish, including the legal standard for making a stop, the length of a stop, and investigative techniques that may be used during a stop. I may need to update it again after the Supreme Court decides United States v. Rodriguez, but it is current for now and is available as a free PDF here.
UNC School of Government
Knapp-Sanders Building
Campus Box 3330 UNC - Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330
T: 919.966.5381 | F: 919.962.0654 © 2020 Copyright,
North Carolina Criminal Law
at the School of Government with the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
at the School of Government with the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jim
January 28, 2015 at 9:40 am
Thank you.
DefenderPerson
January 28, 2015 at 11:36 am
That is awesome. Thanks Jeff.
Supreme Court Rejects “De Minimis” Extension of a Traffic Stop to Deploy a Drug Dog | North Carolina Criminal Law
April 22, 2015 at 8:35 am
[…] for the stop are asked “all the time.” As noted in my paper on traffic stops, which is linked here, though now I need to revise it again, North Carolina law tended not to support delays for […]
U.S. Supreme Court Rejects “De Minimis” Extension of a Traffic Stop to Deploy a Drug Dog | Ten8
April 22, 2015 at 8:53 pm
[…] for the stop are asked “all the time.” As noted in my paper on traffic stops, which is linked here, though now I need to revise it again, North Carolina law tended not to support delays for […]