Smith v. Arizona and Retroactivity
My colleagues have covered the retroactivity rules many times before on the blog but the analysis for determining the retroactivity of new federal rules has changed in the last few […]
June 4, 2014
With Cert Denials, Hope Fades for Clarification on Use of Substitute Analysts
Mumford & Sons has a song called Hopeless Wanderer. When it comes to substitute analysts and the confrontation clause, that song title sums me up, and maybe you as well. […]
September 1, 2011
On the Horizon: U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Another Substitute Analyst Case
In a post here, I wrote about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 131 S. Ct. 2705 (2011), holding that substitute analyst testimony in an impaired […]
Subscribe
Categories
Blog Authors
- Maggie Bailey (3)
- Brittany Bromell (86)
- Emily Coward (8)
- Alexander Cowell (3)
- Melanie Crenshaw (2)
- Michael Crowell (7)
- Shea Denning (636)
- Sara DePasquale (9)
- Phil Dixon (198)
- James Drennan (1)
- Belal Elrahal (30)
- Whitney Fairbanks (1)
- Bob Farb (46)
- Rebecca Fisher-Gabbard (2)
- Jacquelyn Greene (78)
- Alyson Grine (16)
- Timothy Heinle (7)
- Jonathan Holbrook (56)
- Joseph L. Hyde (52)
- Kirsten Leloudis (1)
- Caitlin Little (1)
- Ian Mance (3)
- Jamie Markham (557)
- Chris McLaughlin (1)
- Kristi Nickodem (4)
- Alex Phipps (86)
- M. Jeanette Pitts (2)
- LaToya Powell (7)
- Ethan Rex (3)
- John Rubin (96)
- Jessica Smith (253)
- Meredith Smith (5)
- Daniel Spiegel (41)
- Tom Thornburg (6)
- Hannah Turner (11)
- Christopher Tyner (262)
- Jeff Welty (1203)