Is Your Neighborhood’s 17 MPH Speed Limit Enforceable?

linkedin
Share on Google+
Share on Reddit
Share on Tumblr
Download PDF

I was out for a run the other day when I saw signs posted on a private pathway advising me not to exceed 7.5 miles per hour since children were playing. Sadly for my split times (but happily for the children at play), I was in no danger of exceeding this limit. Those signs reminded me, however, of a question that I’m asked from time to time: Are the speed limits posted on private subdivision streets enforceable?

Many subdivisions consisting of private roadways have these signs, and they often admonish drivers not to exceed a very specific speed that is not a multiple of five, such as 17 miles per hour. But so long as the subdivision roads remain privately owned and are not dedicated to a municipality, driving in excess of these specific speed limits is not a speeding infraction.

Why not? G.S. 20-141(b) makes it unlawful to drive in excess of the following speeds: 35 miles per hour inside municipal limits and 55 miles per hour outside municipal limits. The subsection does not specify the types of roadways to which it applies, but related provisions of G.S. 20-141 make clear that these limitations apply only on streets or highways, which are roadways open to the public as a matter of right. G.S. 20-4.01(13), (46). G.S. 20-141(e) permits local authorities, which include a county, municipality, or other territorial district with a local board or body that is authorized to adopt local police regulations, to adopt ordinances authorizing higher or lower speeds than those set out in G.S. 20-141(b) upon streets that are not part of the State highway system. (Local ordinances may not, however, authorize any speed in excess of 55 miles per hour.) Speed limits set pursuant to G.S. 20-141(e) are effective when appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the part of the streets affected.

Thus, a municipality could adopt a 17 mile-per-hour speed limit, but only for a city street. G.S. 20-141(e); see also G.S. 160A-296 (authorizing a city to regulate public streets, sidewalks, alleys and bridges as discussed here).

Private roads within a subdivision that have not been dedicated to the city are not streets. They may be open to the public, but they are not open to the public as a matter of right. Instead, such private roadways are properly classified as public vehicular areas, which are defined in part as roads used by vehicular traffic within or leading to a gated or non-gated subdivision or community, whether or not the subdivision or community roads have been offered for dedication to the public. G.S. 20-4.01(32)c.

But before you put the pedal to the metal, you should know this. Simply because exceeding the specified speed limit posted on a private subdivision road is not an infraction, a driver may not speed in such an area with impunity. A separate provision of the speeding statute, G.S. 20-141(a), makes it unlawful to drive a vehicle on a street or public vehicular area at a speed “greater than is reasonable and prudent” under existing conditions. Driving too fast for conditions on a private subdivision street is, therefore, a speeding infraction. In addition, driving a vehicle in a public vehicular area “without due caution and circumspection” and at a speed or in a way that endangers, or is likely to endanger, people or property constitutes reckless driving under G.S. 20-140(b), a Class 2 misdemeanor.

5 comments on “Is Your Neighborhood’s 17 MPH Speed Limit Enforceable?

  1. I think I’ll just stick with the better option of teaching my grandchildren to not play in the streets and look both ways before entering or crossing a street instead of depending on a nanny state government or HOA to create a law or ordinance purported to keep them alive.

  2. I am in no way in favor of speeding or bad driving, but “reasonable and prudent” is so vague I’m not sure it should be taken seriously in a criminal context. In my opinion, that’s just not clear enough language to outlaw a behavior.

  3. One of our judges was stopped for speeding on his bicycle during a bicycle race on the Blue Ridge Parkway by a federal “Smokey”. This type of speeding is a federal crime under 18 USC Section 13. The “Smokey” asked for the judge’s name and the judge gave the name of a cartoon character made famous by Charles M. Schulz. The “Smokey” thought that this violated 18 USC Section 1001 which is what sent Martha Steward to jail. Which just goes to show, “Like is like a ten speed bicycle. We all have gears (and laws) that we don’t even use.”

  4. Slightly off-topic but in a similar vein (and Ms Denning, perhaps this is best answered in a new post), yesterday (4/6) in the afternoon there was a multi-agency speed trap on I540 through Knightdale. Digging through information, it appears this was orchestrated by the Knightdale PD. Observed giving what apparently totaled over 100 speeding citations per hour were the PD vehicles of Apex, Morrisville, and several others – I believe Cary, Fuquay, Holly Springs, NCSHP and WSCO. My question pertains to the legality and jurisdiction of any officer/department enforcing traffic and speeding laws somewhere other than their jurisdiction – where does the law fall on this?

    Looks like we may have a new Turberville on our hands:

    http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/state/south-carolina/article86160737.html

  5. South East Maynard Road in Cary, NC .. This is a 4 lane roadway 2 lanes each way. Cary has the speed limit on this road at 35MPH .. We have seen police set up speed traps on this road. Just on June 20, 2018 there was 1 Motorcycle Officer and 4 Squad Cars set up on a side street, clocking vehicles on Maynard Road .. They pulled over a pickup truck and who knows how many others. My question is why this road is only 35MPH when it should be 45MPH as that is what most drivers go.

Leave a Reply