Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences Upon Revocation of Probation

Under G.S. 15A-1344(d), a “sentence activated upon revocation of probation commences on the day probation is revoked and runs concurrently with any other period of probation, parole, or imprisonment to which the defendant is subject during that period unless the revoking judge specifies that it is to run consecutively with the other period.”

In State v. Paige, 90 N.C. App. 142 (1988), the court of appeals addressed the last clause of that section. The case involved a defendant who was convicted of crime #1 in November of 1986 and given a 1-year sentence, suspended. He was then convicted of crime #2 in January of 1987 and given a 5-year sentence, again suspended. A few months later he violated his probation. At the revocation hearing the judge activated both sentences, ordering the 5-year sentence to begin at the expiration of the 1-year sentence. The defendant argued that the revoking judge could not run these sentences consecutively, but the court of appeals disagreed, pointing to the italicized language above.

The court reaffirmed and extended this rule last year in State v. Hanner, 188 N.C. App. 137 (2008). In that case the defendant pled guilty to 16 crimes which were consolidated (pursuant to a plea agreement) into eight judgments with eight 8-10 month sentences, all suspended. Three of the eight sentences were set by the original sentencing judge to run concurrently in the event of revocation. Nevertheless, when Mr. Hanner was found to have violated his probation, the revoking judge set all of the sentences to run consecutively. Citing to Paige, the court of appeals said this was permissible under G.S. 15A-1344(d).

The rule that emerges from Paige and Hanner is that a revoking judge can change the concurrent/consecutive decision made by the original sentencing judge – even when the original concurrent sentences were entered in the same session of court, and even (apparently) when they were entered pursuant to a plea. As to that last point, the original sentence in Hanner was entered pursuant to a plea, but it appears in the procedural history of the case that the original sentencing court ran certain sentences concurrently even though the defendant had actually agreed that they would run consecutively. In that regard Hanner is not a good case to test whether G.S. 15A-1344 is trumped by a contract theory of plea negotiation – the revoking judge really didn’t do anything the defendant hadn’t agreed to.

Suppose the original plea had explicitly been conditioned on concurrent sentences? Could a revoking judge still decide to run the sentences consecutively? Or would the defendant be entitled to the benefit of his or her bargain? I’m interested to hear your thoughts about that.

Just because judges are empowered to do this does not mean they will. As a matter of comity, I imagine many judges are hesitant to tinker with their colleagues’ sentences, absent a good reason for doing so. In any event, judges (and everyone else) should be aware that silence at revocation does not necessarily mean the activated sentence will run as originally entered. To the contrary, under the command in G.S. 15A-1344(d) that an activated sentence runs concurrently unless the revoking judge specifies that it is to run consecutively, DOC will interpret silence at revocation to mean concurrent, even if the original judgment said consecutive. So, if you want to keep consecutive sentences consecutive upon revocation, be sure to fill in the appropriate boxes at the bottom of the first page of the AOC form.

8 thoughts on “Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences Upon Revocation of Probation”

  1. What about in a case where probation was transferred to NC from IN in Feb 2013? The 24 year old defendant was compliant with all terms of probation, attending college & doing well. 15 months into his transferred IN 3 year probation term, May 2014, he committed a felony in NC. The defendant was charged with a felony in Oct 2014 & ordered to serve 18 months in NC prison. The court appointed attorney didn’t ask for the defendant’s case to be run concerently because the atty realized the defendant’s points for sentencing would have put the defendant in a position to get a longer sentence. Indiana revoked defendant’s probation back when he was charged, May 2014, but not yet found guilty of felony. Defendant will be released in Sep 2015 & transferred to IN to face revocation of probation & to possibly serve his initial 3 year sentence in IN. Since his court appointed attorney didn’t ask for the presiding judge to sentence concerently both for his felony charge in NC & for his revocation of transferred probation from Indiana, can an attorney now file a motion asking for a judge to sentence concerently so the defendant doesn’t have to face the transferred Indiana probation revocation? Thank you so much for your consideration & guidance!

  2. I was sentenced to 21 months. I sat the 2/3, so 14 months and then was sitting my last few months on parole in county while fighting a new case. While there, an old case a few years back was brought up and I took a deal for 23 months, concurrent with the 21. So I had time served because I had been in the jail a few months.
    My question now is if I expired on parole while in jail, and then received the 23 month sentence, shouldn’t I only have 2 months parole. Seems like simple math, 23-21? My po is saying I have 5 additional months? SOMEONE HELP, I CAN’T GET AN ANSWER!

  3. I live in montana and I was on parole and had a consecutive sentence that did’nt start till i was off of parole,my parole officer violated me on a dirty U.a but used my consecutive conditions to have the judge take me to court on .
    The arresting warrant didn’t have the right dates of my conditions that was on my consecutive sentence I never signed any conditions for that sentence , why did’nt they violate my parole? I need some answers

  4. Hi I was wondering if I was sentenced to a 12 month sentence and then a 18 month sentence to run consecutive meaning when I’m done with the first sentence can I be revoked for both even if the 18 months haven’t started and no rules or nothing signed

  5. I have a 4 – 12 month suspended sentence for the sale of 7 grams of marijuana …iam on probation here in North Carolina and thet want to put me in drug court for smoking marijuana ( which keeps me healthy and productive) how much time will I have to serve if I activate my sentence? Ty felony4herb


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.