Gant and Herring (June 17, 2009)
Jeff Welty
The Supreme Court (Washington, not Raleigh) has been exceptionally busy with criminal law matters over the last few months. As readers of this blog know, two of the blockbuster decisions […]
BLOG
June 17, 2009
The Supreme Court (Washington, not Raleigh) has been exceptionally busy with criminal law matters over the last few months. As readers of this blog know, two of the blockbuster decisions […]
READ POST "Gant and Herring (June 17, 2009)"June 12, 2009
I’m getting ready to teach a session at the Superior Court Judges’ Conference about searches of computers and other electronic devices, so I’ve been reading all the computer search cases […]
READ POST "Pedophilia and Probable Cause (June 12, 2009)"June 1, 2009
Update: Another statistical analysis of Judge Sotomayor’s work in criminal cases appears here. The conclusion — that she’s pretty close to the middle of the road — is the same […]
READ POST "More Montejo, Mostly (June 1, 2009)"May 27, 2009
Two big developments at the United States Supreme Court. First, President Obama nominated Judge Sonia Sotomayor to replace Justice David Souter. The New York Times story is here, some News […]
READ POST "Montejo v. Louisiana (May 27, 2009)"May 26, 2009
Once in a while, someone requests a post on a particular topic. Today’s post is in response to such a request — which, as I understand it, is not based […]
READ POST "By Popular Demand (May 26, 2009)"May 13, 2009
Most readers of this blog know (1) that a search done pursuant to consent doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment, but (2) that the scope of search is limited by the […]
READ POST "Computer Searches and the Scope of Consent (May 13, 2009)"May 4, 2009
Before December 1, 2006, GS 20-16.3A set forth requirements governing impaired driving checkpoints but not other types of checking stations and roadblocks. While non-DWI checking stations and roadblocks had to […]
READ POST "Stick to the Plan (er, Policy) (May 4, 2009)"April 30, 2009
The Supreme Court’s latest criminal law decision is Kansas v. Ventris, available here. The basic holding is that a statement obtained in violation of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to […]
READ POST "Kansas v. Ventris and the Sixth Amendment (April 30, 2009)"April 29, 2009
OK, one more post about Arizona v. Gant, which I’ve previously discussed here and here. First, School of Government faculty member Bob Farb has written a short paper about Gant […]
READ POST "I Gant Believe I’m Posting about This Case Again! (April 29, 2009)"April 24, 2009
The fallout from the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Arizona v. Gant, see my initial post here, has been fast and furious. Most questions I’ve received have been about how […]
READ POST "Gant, “Retroactivity,” and Retroactivity (April 24, 2009)"