News Roundup

The lead story of the week – besides the beginning of the ACC tournament, naturally – is the introduction of S 306, a bill designed to break the logjam in the execution of death sentences by, among other things, addressing concerns about medical personnel participating in executions; allowing flexibility regarding the procedures for lethal injection; and repealing the Racial Justice Act retroactively. WRAL has the story here. The Conference of District Attorneys supports the bill and the Republican legislature may view it sympathetically, but of course it is too early to tell.

In other news:

  1. The owner of International Internet Technologies (IIT), a leading provider of electronic sweepstakes software, has been arrested in Florida. Essentially, Florida authorities contend that he was using a charitable organization as a front for illegal gambling. Read the News and Observer story here. We’ll see what effect this has, if any, on IIT’s operations and litigation strategy here in North Carolina.
  2. Remember Miller v. Alabama, which held that a juvenile convicted of murder may not automatically be sentenced to life without parole? And how the $64,000 question regarding that case is whether it applies retroactively to the 80+ North Carolina inmates already serving mandatory life without parole sentences for crimes committed when they were under 18? Well, this isn’t an answer for North Carolina, but the United States Department of Justice has conceded, in an Eighth Circuit case, that Miller is substantive, not procedural, and so should apply retroactively.
  3. This week, I noted a couple of stories relating to activity on the roads. First, in Kentucky, law enforcement has found the texting while driving ban to be unenforceable, since it’s impossible to tell whether a driver who is fiddling with a phone is texting or dialing or what. North Carolina officers, have you had a similar experience here? Second, an Ohio judge has ruled, in essence, that speed cameras are a scam and has barred their use. The full story is here.
  4. The new U.S. News law school rankings are out. They’re pretty much the same, at least at the top. But there’s mounting evidence that the shrinking applicant pool has reduced the quality of students at many schools. One possibility is an ever-increasing supply of ever-less-capable lawyers. Fantastic.
  5. Finally, two stories I just couldn’t resist. One, more and more communities are building teeny tiny parks for the purpose of making their neighborhoods off limits to sex offenders. This New York Times story chronicles a Los Angeles park that will be less than 1,000 square feet and is positioned at a busy intersection. Great for the kids! And this story reports on a counterfeiter who returned a printer to Wal-Mart . . . with a sheet of fake hundred dollar bills still inside. You can guess how the story ends.

2 thoughts on “News Roundup”

  1. “Logjam” seems a pretty careless reference to human beings held by the state pending their execution.

    I get your point of course, but referring to suffering human beings as if they were refuse in the river is demeaning, and, I am sure, unintentional on your part.

    That kind of de-personalization is essential I suppose, to heal the psychic injury we do to ourselves by what we refer to as capital punishment, but seems to me those without an agenda to support the death penalty ought to be more careful.

    Just my opinion. Your mileage may vary.

    Bob

    Reply
  2. You seem to have forgotten about all of the prisoners that are inprison for crimes the have have been proven not guilty,and no one cares,.code 2255 th goverment has sent answers to the judges thy agree they are to be released, but thy maybe seat there for months even years before the judge agress and by that time they may have completed there sentence.why is there no time on how long a judge can sit on his decision? Noted in the USA I have a hard time understand as noted in USA about 1000 of prison that have been proven and agreed with by the the govermet an even the ones that put them there state they agree with the goverment are to be released, but the judge has the last word when ever he decides to rule on it. I hope this may bring some rage to anyone that has someone still setting for some Judge to rule on what everyone else already has and release these people before they end up killed or something else in these places.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.