Articles in the Sentencing category - Page 12 of 64

What Last Week’s Supreme Court Opinion May Tell Us about the Current Court (February 25, 2019)

Last week, the Supreme Court issued a per curiam opinion summarily reversing the Texas Court of Criminal appeals and finding that a death row inmate has an intellectual disability. The case doesn’t break new doctrinal ground but it offers some possible insights about how several Justices on the newly constituted Court are positioned on capital cases.

READ POST "What Last Week’s Supreme Court Opinion May Tell Us about the Current Court (February 25, 2019)"

2019 Cost Waiver Report Available (February 7, 2019)

The Administrative Office of the Courts has issued its most recent report on cost waivers to the General Assembly. This report covers the first full year of cost waiver data since the General Assembly’s amendment of G.S. 7A-304(a), requiring written notice and an opportunity to be heard for any government entity directly affected by a waiver. Let’s see if that change had an impact on waiver practices.

READ POST "2019 Cost Waiver Report Available (February 7, 2019)"

Frequency of Parole Reviews (February 1, 2019)

North Carolina did away with parole for most crimes with the adoption of Structured Sentencing in 1994. Parole is still permitted in certain impaired driving cases, but infrequently granted in practice. Still, there are over 1,300 persons on parole in North Carolina. They are mostly former inmates who served time for serious offenses under Fair Sentencing (effective from 1981 to 1994) or other prior law. There are also over 2,000 inmates in prison serving sentences that are now or will one day be eligible for parole. Today’s post considers the law of how often those inmates are considered for parole.

READ POST "Frequency of Parole Reviews (February 1, 2019)"

Part 2: Double Jeopardy and Beyond (December 13, 2018)

For our last official criminal justice class, we heard from five more teams of students about their research projects. (At the students’ request, we also scheduled an extra evening session to watch the third best movie ever made about the law and lawyers—answer at the end of this post.) Once again, the students worked on a wide range of topics and, once again, I learned from the students. Here are some quick takeaways along with a brief discussion of one of the topics—double jeopardy, or more accurately, the absence of double jeopardy protections in the UK.

READ POST "Part 2: Double Jeopardy and Beyond (December 13, 2018)"

Part 1: Policing, DNA, Mental Health, and Rehabilitation (December 6, 2018)

What do the topics in the title of this blog post have in common? They were the focus of the students’ criminal justice presentations this week. Nine teams of students, two on each team, have been researching and preparing their presentations throughout the semester. Here are some of my takeaways from the first set of presentations.

READ POST "Part 1: Policing, DNA, Mental Health, and Rehabilitation (December 6, 2018)"