From This Day Forward:  Technical Corrections Act Amends Statute of Limitations

linkedin
Share on Google+
Share on Reddit
Share on Tumblr
Download PDF

While we wait to see what the North Carolina Supreme Court has to say in State v. Turner about the existing statute of limitations for misdemeanors, the General Assembly has amended G.S. 15-1 for future prosecutions.

The issue. Recall that in State v. Turner, __ N.C. App. ___, 793 S.E.2d 287 (2016) (discussed here and here), the North Carolina Court of Appeals held that the issuance of a magistrate’s order charging a defendant with driving while impaired did not toll the two-year statute of limitations for misdemeanors. Because the defendant was not tried within two years of the offense, the appellate court ruled that the trial court properly dismissed the charges. The court based its decision on the “explicit” language in G.S. 15-1, which required that an indictment or presentment be issued within two years.

The State appealed Turner and an unpublished companion case, State v. Curtis, __ N.C. App. __, 794 S.E.2d 561 (2016), decided the same day and involving the same issues, to the state supreme court. Consolidated oral argument for both cases is scheduled for November 6.

The amendments. The current version of G.S. 15-1 was enacted in 1943. Its provisions pre-date many modern developments in our court system, not least among them the creation of district court. The legislature decided it was time for an update, which it included in S.L. 2017-212 (S 582), the so-called technical corrections act that became law on October 8.

G.S. 15-1, v. 2.0. The statutory amendments are depicted in the image below. Amended G.S. 15-1 specifies that misdemeanors must simply be charged—rather than presented or indicted—within two years of the commission of the offense. Thus, under the amended version of the statute, it is clear that issuance of a citation or a magistrate’s order within two years of the offense would satisfy the statute of limitations.

Beyond Turner. The amendments change G.S. 15-1 in another manner that was not at issue in State v. Turner. Current G.S. 15-1 provides that if a timely indictment for a misdemeanor is deemed defective, another prosecution may be instituted within one year. Amended G.S. 15-1 provides that if any pleading is deemed defective, the state may reinstitute a prosecution within one year. As a result, the State will be able to file new misdemeanor charges more than two years after an offense occurred if the original charges were filed within two years and were dismissed due to a defect in the charging instrument.

The effective date. The amended version of G.S. 15-1 is effective for offenses committed on or after December 1, 2017.

4 comments on “From This Day Forward:  Technical Corrections Act Amends Statute of Limitations

  1. So, just for absolute clarification: assuming Turner is upheld by the Supreme Court, the State will not be able to use the amended G.S. 15-1 to file new charges where the original charge occurred before December 1, 2017 and was dismissed on a Turner motion? Also, it seems to me, anyway, that these changes significantly strengthen the defendant’s argument on appeal.

  2. For most cases anywhere close to running this statute of limitations a speedy trial issue will exist long before the statute has run.

    • HA HA YES! So now in North Carolina they can no longer hold low level misdemeanors over your head for the rest of your life even if a failure to appear order for arrest has been issued. Sorry NC 😂

  3. ^^^^ If defendants and their attorneys assert such a right in a timely fashion, and judges enforce said right.

Leave a Reply