News Roundup

linkedin
Share on Google+
Share on Reddit
Share on Tumblr

The week saw a bit of musical chairs at the state supreme court. Chief Justice Parker stepped down as a result of mandatory retirement and then-Senior Associate Justice Martin was named Chief Justice. Then-court of appeals judge Bob Hunter was named Associate Justice, replacing now-Chief Justice Martin. That should settle everything . . . until November, at which point we’ll have elections for several seats and may see additional changes.

In other news:

Would Michael Brown’s robbery be admissible in a homicide case against the officer who shot him? Michael Brown is the young man who was shot and killed in Ferguson, Missouri. It appears that he had recently robbed a convenience store, but that the officer who shot him may not have known that. If the officer is charged with homicide, would evidence about the robbery be admissible? Ken White at Popehat is skeptical in this post, but former federal judge and current law professor Paul Cassell argues here that evidence of the robbery likely would be admitted. To me, Cassell seems to have the better of the argument, but obviously opinions may differ.

Lawyers question Rick Perry indictment. Texas Governor Rick Perry was indicted for cutting funding to a prosecutor’s office after the prosecutor (a) investigated a program that Perry favored, (b) got arrested for drunk driving and then acted like a jerk, and (c) refused Perry’s request to resign. I’m withholding judgment until more details emerge, but my tentative view is that the indictment is an overreach. The Wall Street Journal Law Blog rounds up a few opinions on the issue here, from across the political spectrum. Most are critical of the indictment.

Mockingbird news. To Kill a Mockingbird is one of the best books ever written about criminal law. Author Harper Lee wrote the book as a young woman and never wrote another, living quietly, perhaps even reclusively, in a small town. There’s a new book out about her, called The Mockingbird Next Door, written by a woman who lived next door to Harper Lee and her sister Alice for several years. It’s a controversial book but I heard an interview with the author, who revealed that Alice Lee was a lawyer who practiced until she was 100 years old. So one sister retired very, very young, and the other seemingly didn’t ever want to retire.

I pity the fool! Children of the 1980s will enjoy this story about Mr. T showing up for jury duty in Illinois, still sporting his trademark Mohawk. Apparently his fans “flocked to him in droves.”

Huge news in the only sport not on ESPN. Finally, the competitive court reporting national championship took place recently in San Francisco. Mark Kislingbury, a reporter known as “the Michael Jordan of court reporting,” was upset by Jo Ann Bryce, who achieved near-perfect accuracy at a dazzling rate of 280 words per minute. Here’s hoping she gets her rightful place on a Wheaties box.

Category: Uncategorized | Tags:

3 comments on “News Roundup

  1. according to jimmy fallon the prosectors elected not to use mr t. explaining that they were concerned he had to much pity.

  2. The characterization of Michael Brown’s alleged conduct at the convenience store as a “robbery” perpetuates a false narrative. Michael Brown has been accused of stealing less than $50 worth of cigars before his murder. No one – not even the Ferguson PD – has alleged he ever threatened to use or even carried a firearm, which is an element of “robbery” as defined by NC law. His alleged alleged conduct amounts to nothing more than misdemeanor larceny in NC. In MO, forcible stealing could amount to second degree robbery. However, it has been reported that the 911 call originated from a customer at the store, the convenience store tapes were reportedly subpoenaed by Ferguson PD, and the owner has, as far as anything I’ve read, denied the use of force. The use of the term “robbery” by attorneys and legal scholars perpetuates a character assassination of a dead teenager rather than taking the facts as they are and as the law would treat them.

  3. Robbery incorporates the actual or perceived use of fear or a weapon…if the store owner refuses to allude to his fear due to possible retribution ( I do not blame him) even though the video shows the force used…that is his choice…the video tape is enough.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


six − 4 =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>