Comments on: Consecutive Sentences for Misdemeanors http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=879 UNC School of Government Blog Thu, 23 May 2013 02:38:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Desuetude http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=879&cpage=1#comment-1165 Desuetude Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:07:37 +0000 http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=879#comment-1165 Looks like State v. Wheeler, NO. COA09-768 (January 19, 2010) may have resolved this. The panel found consecutive suspended sentences to violate § 15A-1340.22, without regard to days of special probation or other active time.

]]> By: Desuetude http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=879&cpage=1#comment-921 Desuetude Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:38:39 +0000 http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=879#comment-921 Do you think that the court did not address the 45 X 8 issue because it was not the specific issue raised in the appeal?

If the defendant had received 2 active and 6 suspended 45-day sentences, all consecutive (without the 10 day split sentences), is it possible that the sentences would be valid but the defendant would be probation-revocation-proof, since he could not receive any additional active time beyond 90 days?

]]>