Comments on: News Roundup http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=2694 UNC School of Government Blog Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:53:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Scott http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=2694&cpage=1#comment-4011 Scott Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:07:09 +0000 http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=2694#comment-4011 Thanks for the haiku!

]]> By: George E. Bourguignon, Jr. http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=2694&cpage=1#comment-4005 George E. Bourguignon, Jr. Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:22:25 +0000 http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=2694#comment-4005 Good post. With regard to the comments about law reviews: Are we expecting from law reviews what we shouldn’t expect? Are they really supposed to be for the average attorney’s daily practice?

]]> By: John T. Barrett http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=2694&cpage=1#comment-4003 John T. Barrett Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:16:16 +0000 http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=2694#comment-4003 Don’t quite know what a “bikini company” is but it sounds appealing.

]]> By: Retired Emergency Judge http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=2694&cpage=1#comment-4002 Retired Emergency Judge Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:52:12 +0000 http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=2694#comment-4002 Thanks for the Haiku.
Case not so confusing now.
Keep up the good work!

]]> By: David Bingham http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=2694&cpage=1#comment-4001 David Bingham Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:15:07 +0000 http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=2694#comment-4001 Bikinis, just fine.

Eight years? Might well be a sign.

Failed bikinis, great.

]]> By: Jenn http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=2694&cpage=1#comment-4000 Jenn Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:59:10 +0000 http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=2694#comment-4000 Baez win. Edwards no.
Ego gets you only so far.
Lawschool can help.

]]> By: David Spence http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=2694&cpage=1#comment-3999 David Spence Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:59:05 +0000 http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=2694#comment-3999 Supreme Court ruled that

Miranda considers age

In juvenile case.

]]>