<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worthless Postdated Checks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=2084</link>
	<description>UNC School of Government Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:48:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick G.</title>
		<link>http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=2084&#038;cpage=1#comment-7582</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=2084#comment-7582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you know of any cases that stand for the proposition that a post dated check is insufficient consideration to support a contract, specifically a residential lease?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know of any cases that stand for the proposition that a post dated check is insufficient consideration to support a contract, specifically a residential lease?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=2084&#038;cpage=1#comment-6803</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=2084#comment-6803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the person who passes the bad check may not be liable for criminal liability, can they still be held under NC Gen. Stat. 6-21.3 for civil liability.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the person who passes the bad check may not be liable for criminal liability, can they still be held under NC Gen. Stat. 6-21.3 for civil liability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Powell</title>
		<link>http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=2084&#038;cpage=1#comment-3609</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=2084#comment-3609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a case for felony obtaining property by false pretenses by representing that there will be money in the account to cover the money at a future date, and then the check not be made good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a case for felony obtaining property by false pretenses by representing that there will be money in the account to cover the money at a future date, and then the check not be made good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
