<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Want a New Trial! Now What? A District Court Judge’s Authority to Act Following Entry of Notice of Appeal for Trial De Novo (Part II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=1086</link>
	<description>UNC School of Government Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:57:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James L. Smith</title>
		<link>http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=1086&#038;cpage=1#comment-11923</link>
		<dc:creator>James L. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 15:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=1086#comment-11923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These issues came up recently after a bench trial in which Judge Samuel A. Cathey found defendant guilty of cyberstalking and then continued prayer for judgment on the payment of the costs and abiding by a 50C order.

You can read more of the sordid details at the blawg and here:
 http://groups.google.com/group/alt.appalachian/browse_thread/thread/518aab70044429da?hl=en#]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These issues came up recently after a bench trial in which Judge Samuel A. Cathey found defendant guilty of cyberstalking and then continued prayer for judgment on the payment of the costs and abiding by a 50C order.</p>
<p>You can read more of the sordid details at the blawg and here:<br />
 <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.appalachian/browse_thread/thread/518aab70044429da?hl=en#" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/alt.appalachian/browse_thread/thread/518aab70044429da?hl=en#</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El</title>
		<link>http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/?p=1086&#038;cpage=1#comment-1679</link>
		<dc:creator>El</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/?p=1086#comment-1679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do not believe that a district court judge can modify pretrial release once notice of appeal is given.  Specifically, N.C.G.S. §15A-534(e)(1) states that: &quot;[A] district court judge may modify a pretrial release order of the magistrate or clerk or any pretrial release order entered by him at any time prior to: (e) (1) In a misdemeanor case tried in the district court, the noting of an appeal;&quot;
                     
N.C.G.S. §15A-534 (e) (2009) emphasis added. 

Thus, under the plain language of the statute, once notice of appeal is given, the district court no longer has jurisdiction to modify a pretrial release order.  Sometimes the state will like to use §15A-1453(a) which states: “ [w]hile an appeal is pending in the appellate division, the court in which the defendant was convicted has continuing authority to act with regard to the defendant&#039;s release pursuant to Article 26, Bail,” § 15A-1453(a),  this statute however is only applicable to cases that fall under article 91 (cases appealed to the appellate division-the court of appeals and the supreme court, and does not apply to cases in the trial division -the district and the superior court- which are governed by article 90.)  See State v. Preston Smith supreme court no. 407PA04 (2005)- sorry I don’t have the nc supreme court case number but the court of appeals  cite is 165 N.C. App. 256, 598 S.E.2d 408 (2004).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not believe that a district court judge can modify pretrial release once notice of appeal is given.  Specifically, N.C.G.S. §15A-534(e)(1) states that: &#8220;[A] district court judge may modify a pretrial release order of the magistrate or clerk or any pretrial release order entered by him at any time prior to: (e) (1) In a misdemeanor case tried in the district court, the noting of an appeal;&#8221;</p>
<p>N.C.G.S. §15A-534 (e) (2009) emphasis added. </p>
<p>Thus, under the plain language of the statute, once notice of appeal is given, the district court no longer has jurisdiction to modify a pretrial release order.  Sometimes the state will like to use §15A-1453(a) which states: “ [w]hile an appeal is pending in the appellate division, the court in which the defendant was convicted has continuing authority to act with regard to the defendant&#8217;s release pursuant to Article 26, Bail,” § 15A-1453(a),  this statute however is only applicable to cases that fall under article 91 (cases appealed to the appellate division-the court of appeals and the supreme court, and does not apply to cases in the trial division -the district and the superior court- which are governed by article 90.)  See State v. Preston Smith supreme court no. 407PA04 (2005)- sorry I don’t have the nc supreme court case number but the court of appeals  cite is 165 N.C. App. 256, 598 S.E.2d 408 (2004).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
